Communal Harmony Seers assure Muslims, offer shelter in temples Nov 18,Times of India Reacting to reports of Muslims of Ayodhya feeling unsafe due to gathering of VHP activists for Dharm Sabha on November 25, the seers and temple mahants have assured support and security to Muslims and said that Muslims can take shelter in temples if they feel any insecurity.
A Critique Please Wait. The essence of justice lies in Rule of law which requires that law of land is stable and not arbitrary that is to say, law is not ruled by the changing government rather the government and its instrumentalities are ruled by the law.
The ideal notion of the rule of law can be traced in ancient Indian legal system which laid greater emphasis on the duty, by making the king as the head of administration. Dharma in ancient India did not denote any kind of religion or right but only the performance of the duties .
Although the king was the fountain head of the administration of justice, his powers were limited by the norms of Rajadharma. There was no distinction between weaker and stronger and the weaker was able to prevail over stronger with the assistance of the king if his rights or liberty was encroached.
This duty approach setup of Rajadharma was distorted with the coming of the Moughals and subsequently after the coming of Britishers.
Power is like a river, if controlled, it brings happiness and prosperity otherwise destruction and curse. The constitution also kept few most cherished values of the humankind beyond the reach of these three organs . Constitution seeks to remove three kind of disparity namely social, economic and politicalso that weaker can prevail over stronger with the help of law if his right is violated and, Each organ of the state is required to work in this context without violating the power arrangement of the constitution.
There was no sanction and People used to follow Dharma on their own, because of its intrinsic merit . Since Dharma was entirely dependent upon the effective implementation of Rajadharma it was considered as supreme dharma.
This supremacy of Law has long before found prominence in the principles of Raja dharmathe constitutional law of ancient India.
Unlike western kings whose command constituted the imperative law, in ancient India Dharma law was a command even to the king and was superior to the king. Rules of Dharma were not alterable according to the whims and fancies of the king.
The prevalent doctrine was that 'the law is the king of kings'. The doctrine that 'the king can do no wrong' was never accepted in our ancient constitutional system. If the king violated the Rajadharma the punishment prescribed for him was one thousand times more penalty than what would be inflicted on an ordinary citizen.
Customs and sadhachars were also were also applied if they were in conformity to the Dharmas. King had no legislative power; It was vested in a sabha committee of wise people. Thus in ancient India there was independent judiciary and independent legislature.
The King, under the codes of Rajadharma was bound to take cognizance, and therefore bringing a matter to his notice was enough to render it fit for judicial proceeding, to redress the grievances.
Thus the king was supposed to restore the stolen property to its owner and if he failed in performance of his duties he had to pay the owner the actual cost of the stolen property.
Emphasis was on substance not on form. The ideal laid down was that all the people should be happy Sarve Janah Sukhino Bhavantu. Whenever the right or liberty of an individual was encroached upon by another, the injured individual could seek protection from the law with the assistance of the king, however, powerful the opponent wrong doer might be.
Thus there was parity of powers between the individuals to seek the equal protection of laws. The present Indian judicial process is governed by British imposed adversary system even though there is no mention of it in the constitution.
Main attributes of this system can be understood under following heads: The formal access to justice is basically adjudication of disputes by the courts which follow the rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure.
They are not bound by the provisions of C. C but has to follow the principles of natural law. Informal and formal modes of justice both are against the principles of parity of law devised by Article 14 of the constitution, because in informal modes of access to justice one has to often compromise with his legal rights in interest of time, cost of money etc.
Formal modes of access to justice also has many drawbacks which are discussed below- 1. Law of limitation : The aggrieved person has to satisfy first of all that his suit is not barred by the law of limitation act and if barred by law of limitation the judge may or may not entertain his suit.
Thus it is absolutely denial of Article 14 which imposes unqualified duty on state to provide equal protection of lawsand is anathema to any kind of arbitrariness. Law of limitation is nothing but a restatement of exploiting British imposed law of limitation actthus it is also hit by Article 13 2.
This high cost of court fees compels the litigants to abandon their just claims and defences. Here justice is not given but sold.
It also does not satisfy the ethical, time and other essentials of the power spectrum . He never intends to provide the justice by bringing the truthbut to award the best competitor.
Thus in this situationthe determining factor for the judicial process and justice is the competency of lawyer which depends upon the financial capacity of the partywhich results in absolute denial of the parity of power guaranteed by Article After institution of the suit the aggrieved person has to go through the procedures of C.Bhopal Gas Tragedy was a gas leak incident in India, considered one of the world’s worst industrial catastrophes.
It occurred on the night of the last year of at the Bhopal Union Carbide Corporation (Union Carbide India Limited – UCIL) pesticide plant in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. Ethical Issues, Safety Standards - Bhopal Union Carbide Case analysis The Bhopal Gas Tragedy Essays - On the 3rd of December , a gas leakage incident happened in Bhopal, India.
Methyl isocyanate(MIC), a deadly poisonous gas was accidentally leaked and spread into air from the Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) plant. Essay on . Advt. No. 05/ Dated Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission (MPPSC) organizes exam named State Service Examination for recruitment of various posts of Nayab Tehsildar and State Administrative Service.
Many Interested Candidates filled there Online Application Form. Bhopal Gas Tragedy and Its Ethical Issues Words | 13 Pages CASE STUDIES: BHOPAL GAS TRAGEDY AND ITS ETHICAL ISSUES SUMMARY Bhopal Gas Tragedy was a gas leak incident in India, considered one of .
A TV news broadcast last week on ABC affiliate, Channel 10 (KGTV), in San Diego, California, featured a woman, Facika Tafara, who reported that she is being stalked by perpetrators who are using the sort of counterintelligence disruption operation tactics described in this caninariojana.comtly, the stalkers have been conducting a variant of “gaslighting” operations (break-ins intended to.
Funds collected outside Pune mosques help rebuild 74 Dalit homes in Pune In a heart-warming story of Dalit-Muslim unity from Maharashtra, an NGO managed to rebuild homes of 74 Dalit families who lost their homes to a fire with the help of generous contributions from the .